HOW OLIVIA NEWTON-JOHN HEALED HERSELF FROM BREAST CANCER

by Yeong Sek Yee & Khadijah Shaari

Oliver newton

This is a short story about how Olivia Newton John healed herself from breast cancer. She has been one of our favourite country singers whose songs are very meaningful and will really touch your soul. As we are writing this, we are listening to one of her top hits “I Honestly Love You.” If you have not heard this song for some time, take a breather from reading this article and listen to the song at the following link (and hum the tune to your loved one):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn6tBYUiWKQ

Throughout her singing and acting career Olivia has exuded a positive personality and a soulfulness that have infused each of her projects with warmth and spiritual energy that for many of her fans have become her signature. Her passion for her work has translated into not only her creative projects but also the many advocacy efforts she has undertaken—ranging from environmental causes to health issues—to effect positive change in her own life and in the world around her.

In the summer of 1992, Olivia felt a lump in her right breast. “I had found lumps before,” she says, “but this particular time I wasn’t feeling well, and I didn’t feel good about it.” Her doctor recommended a mammogram, which did not turn up anything unusual, yet Olivia’s instinct told her that what she was feeling was not right. Her doctor listened, and he performed a needle biopsy. Again, the result was benign. Still convinced that something was very wrong, Olivia and her doctor agreed that they would proceed with a surgical biopsy. Their final biopsy did indeed find cancer (Stage 3). Tragically; the diagnosis was confirmed on the weekend her father died of liver cancer.

Following her diagnosis, Olivia underwent a modified radical mastectomy and one year of chemotherapy before her treatment was finished. She endured the side effects of treatment, which included headaches, fevers, and fatigue; and she still remembers with a shudder the anti-nausea “cocktail” she was given at the time. However, it was her decision to integrate complementary therapies into her treatment plan that Olivia says really helped her through.

Working with her oncologist to ensure that none of the alternative treatments would interfere with the standard treatment protocol, Olivia had regular massage therapy as well as regular acupuncture sessions, which were especially helpful in alleviating her nausea. She also practiced yoga, meditated regularly, and consulted a doctor who was an herbalist.

Each of these additional steps that she took to care for her health and her spirit, Olivia says, was integral to her healing. “It had to be more than slash and burn for me,” she says, of integrating a complementary approach.

Olivia’s journey from diagnosis and treatment in 1992 to recovery was a long and winding road. Ironically, that was the title of one of her chart topper” A Long and Winding Road” in 1971. Listen to the song at the following link (and ponder upon the lyrics):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TV6_x0Iv15I

Since her diagnosis and treatment, Olivia has been a crusader for all things alternative and spiritual. The comfort Olivia found in alternative therapies when she had cancer is her reason for establishing the Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre in Melbourne, Australia. The Centre replaced the cancer wards at the Melbourne-based Austin Hospital and also collaborates with the New York-based Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research. In addition to traditional cancer therapies, the Centre offer patients and their families support and cancer education programs, as well as complementary therapies focusing on meditation, relaxation, massage, art and music, nutrition, exercise and aromatherapy.

In a recent interview, Olivia, when asked how she has survived so long since 1992, attributed her successful cancer journey to the following:

  • I owe my good health to several things particularly my wonderful doctors! A positive attitude, which is essential to ones ultimate survival, good nutrition both emotionally and in a dietary sense are invaluable.
  • I balanced my western chemotherapy and surgery with eastern philosophies and practiced meditation, yoga and prayer.
  • I complemented my treatments with herbs; homeopathy and acupuncture to combat my nausea and to help me stay centered and focused.
  • Equally important were my conversations with other women who have gone through the same treatment. It helped me to understand what was ahead of me.
  • I realize that I am blessed to be alive and every day I acknowledge and affirm that life is a gift–so live in the present! I see it as a gift,” 
  • Last but not least, the support of my family and good friends was priceless and lots of laughter–the best medicine of all!!!

Olivia Newton-John has very successfully combined both Western and Eastern healing modalities and has survived 20 years already. Obviously the 2 healing methods did not clash at all. This “clashing” talk by our oncologists is certainly a lot of bull. Don’t you think so? We welcome your views.

Below are some YouTube videos on Olivia Newton-John and her breast cancer journey:

1)    Olivia Newton John Opens Up About Breast Cancer

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSonDCBRU3I

2)    Olivia Newton- John overcomes Breast Cancer!

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NrWV0lDgO8

3)    Healing Quest: Olivia Newton-John Embraces Natural Wellness

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzuJA827iNc

4)    Olivia Newton-John Easterling about breast cancer

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMGc0yQ5GmE

Video Presentation of Chris’ Talk at Universiti Teknologi MARA 2013

MARA-talk

 

 

Part 1: It works and that is that that matters

 

Part 2: Herbs are effective for gynae problems

 

Part 3: Herbs are effective for coughs

 

Part 4: Herbs are effective for cancer pains

 

Part 5: Herbs are effective for cancer

 

Part 6: Breast Cancer: A Tragedy

 

Part 7: The CA Care Therapy

 

Your Breasts: What to do if there is a lump? What to do if it is cancerous?

Your-Breasts-Cover

Available in either pdf or epub formats for only US$2.99 (approx. RM 10) 

PDF format: http://bookoncancer.com/productDetail.php?P_Id=68

EPUB format: http://bookoncancer.com/productDetail.php?P_Id=69

 What Do You Do If You Find A Lump In Your Breast? 

Since the subject matter of breast cancer involves extensive discussion I propose to write two books on this subject. This first book addresses the concerns of people who have found lump(s) in their breast(s) and what they need to do. Let us tackle the problem one step at a time and get it right from the beginning.

At CA Care we ask you to go and see your doctor and get your problem diagnosed first. And if it is cancerous, we take the position that you need to go for a mastectomy (remove the whole breast) or lumpectomy (remove only the lump). This is exactly what any doctor will also tell you to do. So why do you need to read this book then? You can get it all from the doctors you have consulted! But the similarity ends there.

As a patient you expect your doctor to explain everything you want to know before he/she proceeds to cut you up. But in reality this never happens. At most you are given 10 minutes to consult your doctor. What can you learn in 10 minutes?

Ina, the lady who we shall be talking in great detail in this book went to see an oncologist. She was given 10 minutes. The doctor did not even look up to see her. He looked at the medical report and keyed in some data into his computer and then rattled out some number. Ina was not impressed or happy. Her husband said, “He talked about money first.” Much of the consultation was about the cost involved and Ina was left with little time for questions that she wanted to ask. This consultation cost RM106.

Our distant relative, the late Corrina had pancreatic cancer. She consulted the “best” oncologist in town. The conversation lasted about 10 minutes. The oncologist asked, “Oh, you stay in Sea View. What are you working as? Do you buy health insurance?

Corrina said, ” He asked me to lie down. Checked here and checked there.  He saw the scans. He put on his computer and showed four patients. One was a miracle case – he survived 6 years with no sign of cancer coming back. He said there are 3 types of people that he treated. The one type is completely cured. The second type is in remission and the third type is just wasting his time. He is suggesting that I am type that is wasting his time. He said, “I can’t cure you.” But he asked me to go back and think and decide. He then said, “I can start you on chemo. Chemo is every week, for 8 times. (My husband) asked about the side effects. He replied, “Nothing.”

If you only have 10 to 15 minutes with your oncologist – and have to pay SGD 700 (about RM 1,774) for that – you probably need to be more organized before meeting him – so as to get the most of his valuable time.  Unfortunately, what you want from your oncologist differ greatly from what your oncologist wants from you!

Take it from me, all these information and guidance you need cannot be found in the hospital setting! Over

the years, I have seen how faces full of anguish and fear turned to bright smiles after consulting with us. What is more, we do this without any charge!

Now, I thought I would help many more people if I put my thoughts into a small “how to” guide book.

In this book, I take you through this first part of your cancer journey, one step at a time. In Chapter 1, I tell all patients, “Don’t panic.” Let us go through your problem together.

In Chapter 2, I ask you to go and find out if the lump is benign or malignant. Most of the time, the doctor would want you to do a biopsy first. “Do you need to do a biopsy?” is discussed in Chapter 3. If the lump is big, there is no reason to keep it in your breast – irrespective of whether it is cancerous or not.

In Chapter 4, I explained why you should not keep the cancerous breast anymore. There are situations when you can save the breast by doing a lumpectomy instead of a mastectomy. I explained these procedures in Chapter 5.

In the event that losing a breast is beyond acceptance, you can consider breast reconstruction surgery. Get a plastic surgeon to “make” you a new breast. This is explained in Chapter 6.

I hope the information in the first part of the book would be enough to provide some comfort and guidance on this first part of your journey. Also with this information you are better prepared to face your doctor and would be knowledgeable enough to be able to ask important and sensible questions.

Then in Chapter 7, it is time to put your knowledge into action. I addressed the issues of how to find the “right” doctor – and where? For those who have to pay the medical bills from their own pockets, I teach you how to “save” some expenses. You may benefit from my practical advice. Imagine, a mastectomy done in a certain hospital by a certain surgeon costs 9 times LESS than if you do the same operation in Singapore, or two or three times LESS if you do in other “normal” hospitals.

What comes after surgery is discussed in Chapter 8, the last chapter of the book. Surgery is just one “small challenge” you have to go through. The next “bigger challenge” is yet to come. In Chapter 8, I discuss one possible option which you may wish to consider if you don’t want to go for chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Unfortunately this is a big issue to tackle. Since I intend to make this book small enough for you to be able to read within a few hours, I shall leave the issue of chemotherapy / radiotherapy for my next book.

I am aware that most of you do not have the time to read too much while you are under such a “stressful” situation. So, I have tried to be precise and concise in my advice here.

This book will give you some advice that you need to at least keep you calm and get you through the first step of your cancer journey.

I am also aware that I have to keep up with this age of modern information technology. I have made the book available in both Pdf or ePub formats which can be down loaded into your hand phone (iPhone or Android), iPad, and tablet besides your computer. So this book can be read with just a click of a button wherever you are – even in the waiting room while waiting to see your doctor.

select-iPadThe book in iPad

select-iPhone

The book in your palm using the iPhone

select-Android

The book in your palm, Android handphone

Screenshot

Screenshot from Android

Buy your book at:

PDF format: http://bookoncancer.com/productDetail.php?P_Id=68

EPUB format: http://bookoncancer.com/productDetail.php?P_Id=69

BOOK REVIEW: Your Brain After Chemo

A Practical Guide to Lifting the Fog and Getting Back Your Focus 
by Dan Silverman, MD, PhD and Idelle Davidson

Silverman_BrainAfterChemo_mech.indd

Reviewed by Yeong Sek Yee & Khadijah Shaari

As we were reviewing this book, we had a firsthand encounter with an old classmate with “chemo-brain.” This lady has undergone 8 cycles and is currently undergoing another series of 18 cycles of chemotherapy treatment for cancer of the pancreas which has spread to the liver. Recently we (and some other old classmates) made arrangements to visit her on Sunday 18th Aug at 3.00 pm, but this was subsequently changed to Tuesday at 11.00 am. When the group arrived at her house on Tuesday at 11.00 am, this lady insisted that our rendezvous was supposed to be at 3.00 pm and not 11.00 am

The above is a good illustration of what “chemo brain” is. The mental fog and forgetfulness are no figment of the patient’s imagination. It is very real.

The book is co-authored by Dr. Daniel Silverman, head of neuronuclear imaging and Associate Professor of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and award-winning journalist and breast cancer survivor Idelle Davidson.

This book validates what cancer patients and survivors have been telling doctors for a long time and that is, chemotherapy can cause significant cognitive dysfunction – even years after treatment. Until recently, oncologists often discounted or trivialized “chemo brain.” The authors gave 2 clear examples:

  • Barbara, unemployed related the following story….”my oncologist said there are no data out there about chemo brain. He discounted it, saying I’m fifty, the whole menopause thing. He patted me on the back, made me feel like I’m an idiot.”
  • Jessica, an office manager related….I was halfway through my chemo regimen, and I felt dull, like I was running on all cylinders. My oncologist said…”well, we’ll put you on an antidepressant; that should take care of everything.” Jessica was so taken aback that she remarked to the oncologist….”I am not crazy or deeply depressed.”

But the authors present plenty of evidence to the contrary. This well-researched book provides alarming-but-necessary information on chemotherapy’s effect on patients’ cognitive abilities. A significant number of patients reported concentration losses, multitasking problems, attention deficits, as well as many types of memory loss.

However, Dr Silverman and Davidson do acknowledge that there is a fine line between a patient who has cognitive impairment and one who has depression, pointing out that mood can also affect cognitive functioning and vice versa. The book highlights that depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment are sometimes all intertwined. For example, according to the authors, when people are depressed, “they also struggle with memory, attention, and concentration problems.”

The authors also guide readers through the kinds of questions about chemotherapy that patients can ask their doctors. Silverman and Davidson also provide excellent information on methods that might work to alleviate depression – such as cognitive therapy, yoga, acupuncture, and meditation.

The book also covers foods that can help foster a healthy mind, as well as ways of coping with insomnia, fatigue, inattention, and problems concentrating. The authors devoted CHAPTER 6 to explaining the type of BRAIN FOODS that cancer patients should avoid/consume in order to improve their brain functions. Briefly, these are:

  • Avoid all saturated and trans fats—cheese, whole milk, butter, lard, etc all can cause a “brain attack” or the death of brain cells caused by poor blood flow.
  • Also avoid all Omega 6 products besides the above—these are essentially fried foods, mayonnaise, cookies, cakes, chips, crackers, cereals, seeds and nuts and refined oils such as soybean, safflower, sunflower, cottonseed and corn oils.

(Omega-6 promote inflammation and causes chronic inflammation)

  • Omega-3 fatty acids are crucial to brain development and in maintaining optimal brain function and vision….main sources are oily cold-water fish and plant sources like flaxseed, flaxseed oils and walnuts.

(Omega -3 fatty acids help promote healthy mental processing)

  • Consume some “brain-friendly antioxidants” such as beta-carotene, lycopene, Vitamin E, selenium and Vitamin C. Other phytochemicals recommended are Vitamin D, Vitamin B12, Coenzyme Q10 and gingko biloba.

Good nutrition is not just about the body. What we consume has a direct relationship to our cognitive well-being. Omega-3 fats are linked to good brain (and heart) health and protect against neurodegenerative diseases and may help with mood, learning and memory. When we nourish the brain, we feed the mind.

Did your doctor/oncologist recommend to you any of the above or did he just prescribe you some anti-depressants just like Jessica??

Filled with personal stories from many cancer survivors, the authors present many long-term strategies that anyone can use to start recovering from chemobrain. Included is a daily nine-step program that should boost your brain functioning over time. You will learn how and why to sleep well, watch your diet, be careful of what you drink, do regular exercise, monitor your mood, and stay healthy. As your memory and other strategic thinking processes return, you will feel better about yourself and regain confidence.

For further information, do visit the authors’ blog at:

http://yourbrainafterchemo.blogspot.com/

Another book in the same category as this one reviewed is ChemoBrain: How Cancer Therapies Can Affect Your Mind by Ellen Clegg (Author), Dr. Steward Fleishman, MD .

The brain fog that afflicts many people who have undergone standard or high-dose chemotherapy is known as “chemobrain.” In this clear, concise guide for cancer patients, survivors, families, friends, and caregivers, journalist Ellen Clegg provides the latest information on this much-discussed but poorly understood side effect of chemotherapy treatment.

Based on interviews with physicians and scientists who have treated and studied this problem, Clegg explains in understandable terms how chemotherapy works at the most basic biological level and also provides practical tips for coping with the aftermath of chemotherapy treatment. Website: http://www.chemobraininfo.org/

If you are keen on more information on chemobrain, just follow the following links:

RELATED REFERENCES:

1)    Scientists Find ‘Chemo Brain’ No Figment Of The Imagination

Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/10/061006072544.htm 

2)    Scientific Basis for Cognitive Complaints of Breast Cancer Patients

Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130419132613.htm

3)    Neuroscientist Sheds Light On Cause for ‘Chemo Brain’

Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/02/130221115922.htm

4)    ‘Chemo Brain’: Researchers Identify Physiological Evidence of Chemotherapy-Induced Changes in the Brain

Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121127003324.htm

5)    Breast Cancer Survivors Struggle With Cognitive Problems Several Years After Treatment

Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111212093738.htm

6)    Chemobrain: The Flip Side Of Surviving Cancer

Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090917111518.htm

SOME VIDEOS ON CHEMO BRAIN

1)    WHAT IS CHEMO BRAIN?

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbKYn4ZtQcA 

2)    Chemo brain after cancer treatment – Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK1UqTnD5GI 

3)    Cure for Chemo Brain / Brain Fog

 Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXKbYaYk3ys 

4)    Deanna’s Discovery: Chemo brain

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRa_LvBZjS4 

5)    Chemo Brain

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5NPh1u4N9U

 

CANCER’S COLLATERAL DAMAGE: PART 1 A LYMPHOMA STORY

By Yeong Sek Yee & Khadijah Shaari

 Conventional cancer treatments, especially the chemotherapeutic agents are toxic and can cause a great deal of collateral damage to the body besides the nausea, vomiting and hair loss that your doctor tells you about. Collateral damage is damage to things that are incidental to the intended target and this is best illustrated by Dr. David Levy, former president of the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Canada:

  • “In fighting the war on cancer, there is, like in any war, unwanted collateral damage. There is no silver bullet, but in many ways, a refined shotgun, blasting the tumour while pellets hit other vital organs.
  • ·         “The bone marrow, liver, and nervous system get their share of hits, but the heart and vascular system are certainly at risk depending on the weapon used, particularly because the vascular system and blood supply are intimately involved in any treatment delivery.

Link:http://blogs.vancouversun.com/2010/09/25/the-heart-collateral-damage-from-cancer-treatment/

Dr Russell Blaylock, a neurosurgeon, described other more serious collateral damage such as depressed production of blood-forming cells, cardiac toxicity, pulmonary complications, gastrointestinal complications, liver injury, kidney and neurological complications in Chapter 3….Chemotherapy: Poisoning Cancer (and You) in the New York bestseller, NATURAL STRATEGIES FOR CANCER PATIENTS. 

In 2012, Dr Margaret I. Cuomo, MD, a board- certified radiologist, published A WORLD WITHOUT CANCER. In Chapter 7, “Cancer’s Collateral Damage,” Dr Cuomo described the cancer journey of Toni, a 50 year old artist and her husband Doug, a golf professional and how the couple saw “the darkest side of our current cancer care paradigm” The couple endured Toni’s frequent hospitalizations, the debilitating side effects of one cancer drug after another, false hope, and a mounting pile of bills. Their ordeal ended with Toni’s death less than 4 years later after her diagnosis of lymphoma.

Below is Toni’s sad story as told by Dr Cuomo in her book:

In late November 2007, Toni, was diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, a common form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Scans revealed Toni had an especially aggressive cancer with tumors scattered across her abdominal area and elsewhere. Still, her oncologist spoke optimistically about the package of treatment options available, and she was co-operative and prepared for the fight.

After surgery to remove the tumors, Toni began a six-cycle regimen of chemotherapy, receiving an eight-hour infusion every few weeks. By the third round, she could barely move from her bed between infusions, but she persevered, and at the end of June 2008, Toni and her husband Doug, received good news. “We got it” her doctors proclaimed. Everyone believed the cancer was gone.

Toni was told she would have to return for scans every three months for the first year, and then less frequently. Doug remembers the doctor saying, “After five years, you won’t have to come back at all.”

Weakened by the chemotherapy, Toni spent much of the summer and fall regaining her strength. Life for the couple was good again. Until March 2009, that is, when a post-treatment scan showed that the cancer had recurred and had spread. Toni’s oncologist suggested that she would be a good candidate for a bone marrow transplant, which had to be done at a cancer center about 100 miles from their home.

After learning more about the rigorous and difficult procedure – including claims (by their oncologist) that it had a 95% success rate – Toni agreed to begin treatment.

Additional potent chemotherapy had to come first. This time, Toni was admitted to the local hospital, where she received chemotherapy around the clock for three days every three weeks. A post-chemo scan again showed no evidence of cancer, and the couple headed to the cancer center, ready for the bone marrow transplant. Their insurance company had already said yes to the US$400,000 treatment. It was July 2009.

The first step was to harvest Toni’s bone marrow stem cells, which took eight hours a day over five consecutive days. Another week of chemotherapy came next, and then the stem cells were infused back into her body during a four-hour procedure.

She remained hospitalized for the next three weeks, as the stem cells started to grow again. Once, her blood pressure plunged and her platelet levels dropped to dangerously low levels, bringing her perilously close to death.

Although she recovered, Toni’s health had been compromised, and remained so after her release from the hospital. Shortly afterward, her temperature spiked to 105 F, a fungal infection was found in her lungs, and she was readmitted for further treatment. The fungus might have been there for a long time, held in check until her immune system was weakened by chemotherapy and could no longer fight the latent infection. Her antifungal medicine cost US$5,600 a month.

Toni was finally able to return home in late October 2009, although the demands of continuing treatment and follow up meant the couple had to make weekly four-hour round-trip drives to the hospital.

In February 2010, Toni returned for a scan, expecting it to show that the bone marrow transplant had worked. The couple thought this would be their moment of triumph, a second chance for a longer life. Instead, they learned that Toni still had evidence of cancer. A year of suffering had been in vain.

Her doctors suggested another transplant. Nothing else will work, they said. Toni balked. “No,” she said. “You didn’t have to go through what I went through. You didn’t almost die. You’re not the ones who didn’t have any quality of life for almost a year.” Then, she added quietly, “I don’t know whether or not we can afford it”

The doctor’s response: “You don’t have to worry. Your insurance company paid for everything the first time. It will pay for everything again.”

That wasn’t quite true, of course. “Insurance didn’t pay for us to live away from home for eight months,” Doug recalls. “It didn’t pay for a lot of the drugs Toni needed, It didn’t pay for the fact that both of us were out of work for quite some time. The insurance company covers the medical cost, but it doesn’t cover the costs of the disease.”

Even so, they decided to try another transplant. Over the next few months, more health problems intervened. Toni’s spleen swelled to five times its normal size, her white blood cell count plunged and she developed pneumonia. Meanwhile, scans showed that her cancer kept surging.

Still, the doctors insisted she remained a candidate for the transplant. The procedure was scheduled, canceled, rescheduled, and canceled once more.

As many patients do when they have exhausted all other options, Toni entered a clinical trial, this one assessing a new combination drug treatment. Beginning in April 2011, the couple began making regular trips to the hospital for the protocol. With the tumors shrinking, the punishing treatment schedule seemed worth it. The second bone marrow transplant again seemed possible.

Then, new obstacles arose. When Toni complained of headaches, invasive tests revealed that lymphoma cells had invaded her cerebral spinal fluid. The cancer was in her brain.

Yet another drug treatment option was put on the table, but this time her oncologist was finally ready to advise against it. “You can do this if you want, but I don’t recommend it”, he said bluntly. “You will be in the hospital for six months. It’ll be hell, and then you will die.”

Toni’s fight was over. The doctor said that she would probably survive until Thanksgiving but doubted that she would make it to Christmas. On September 29, 2011, Toni’s courageous four-year battle came to an end. She was 54.

When illness first occurred, Toni and Doug had steady jobs, good insurance, and friends willing to help. The couple incurred US$50,000 in out-of-pocket medical costs and another US$150,000 in living expenses, including bills for hotels, food, and gas. After long periods without a regular income, the couple couldn’t meet their monthly obligations. Decades of careful savings vanished.

Doug wondered now if they were given false hope. Had we known the full extent of what was ahead, I don’t think we would have gone through what we did,” he says. Was what we went through done to teach somebody else? Or was it done for the revenue?

It is hard for him not to feel cynical about the agenda of those in the cancer industry and the influence of money on decision making. In my heart, I believe if we wanted to find a cure for cancer, we would have done so a long time ago,” Doug said. “I don’t believe the medical profession wants to find a cure. They would like to find effective treatments for cancer, but a cure? No. There would be too many people out of work.”

I truly believe,” he adds, “that if our insurance hadn’t paid the doctors as well as it did, they wouldn’t have encouraged us to keep on with treatment.”

Dr Cuomo’s concluding remarks:

Understandably, Doug may be a bit harsh in his judgment of Toni’s physicians. Treating people with cancer is a delicate and tricky process, with oncologists trying to keep their patients alive by staying one step ahead of the disease. It is hard to know just how much extra gain can be achieved, at what price, and exactly when the struggle becomes futile. Right now, most therapy buys patients with advanced cancer only a little more time.

Postscript

Another sad story is that of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis who was diagnosed with NHL in Jan 1994. She received chemotherapy and radiation treatments at the prestigious New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Centre. The New York Times reported that she “initially responded to therapy, but it (the cancer) came back in her brain and spread through her body.”

For the unrelenting pain in her neck, Mrs. Onassis received more drugs. For the acute pneumonia she developed in her weakened state, she received more drugs. Steroids were part of the mixture in her chemotherapy, which caused a perforated ulcer in her stomach. In the middle of her ordeal, she had to be operated on to sew up the hole in her stomach.

She went from bad to worse, and as a final assault on her body, she was subjected to even more radiation and chemotherapy, only this time it was shot directly into her brain. The cancer spread to her spinal cord, her liver, and throughout the body. She became weak and disoriented, lost weight, developed shaking chills, her speech slowed, and she had difficulty walking.

Mrs. Onassis passed away in May 1994…..just 5 months after diagnosis.

Similarly, King Hussein of Jordan was diagnosed with NHL July 1998 and began 6 months of chemotherapy and 2 bone marrow transplants. King Hussein passed away in Feb 1999 at age 63……..just 8 months after diagnosis.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

In the stories of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, and King Hussein of Jordan, was it a case of excessive collateral damage or did the chemotherapy drugs spread the cancer? How come scientifically tested, evidence-based medicine could not save them then or was the lymphoma too aggressive?

We welcome your thoughts.

BREAST CANCER — A NINETEEN-MONTH TIMELINE

by Yeong Sek Yee & Khadijah Shaari

Allow us to share with you the sad news of the recent demise of a close relative who was diagnosed with breast in December 2011.  To us, this is a classic case of a lady who did not die because of the breast cancer – she died due to the breast cancer treatments that she diligently underwent since diagnosis.

This 65-year old lady was a very staunch and caring Christian and very much loved and admired by her siblings, relatives and friends.  Perhaps her weak point in her journey with cancer is her unquestioning loyalty to her doctors/oncologist (her son is also a medical doctor).  From Day One, she listened very faithfully to her oncologist who advised her not to consume antioxidants, herbs or other complementary treatments as these will “clash” with her chemotherapy and subsequent radiotherapy, and hence the efficacy of her conventional treatments will be compromised.

Briefly, in December 2011, when she was diagnosed with a 3.8 cm lump in her left breast, she was told by an oncologist (in Singapore) that the lump is too big for surgical removal.  She was then advised to have at least 8 sessions of chemotherapy “to shrink the tumour” before surgery could be performed.  She followed the doctor’s advice and underwent chemotherapy during the whole of 2012 – 6 sessions of EC (Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide) followed by 5 sessions of docetaxel, which ended in January 2013.

Come January 2013, instead of the tumour shrinking, the condition of her breast became more inflamed, with a few more new lumps appearing at the sides the breast. She was then advised by her hometown oncologist to consider radiotherapy.  So she came to KL for that purpose as the radiotherapy machine in her hometown was not working.  Whilst in KL she consulted with two prominent breast surgeons, who advised that (as at January 2013), surgery was definitely not an option based on the condition of the breast after 11 sessions of chemotherapy. She subsequently did 33 sessions of radiotherapy from January to March 2013, with the intention of shrinking the five lumps.  Again, while she was undergoing radiotherapy she was warned by her oncologist and radiologist not to take any herbs or antioxidants until everything is over.  At the end of the 33 sessions she was referred back to her hometown oncologist, with a report that the cancer has metastasized to her bone.

Back in her hometown, her oncologist recommended a new drug, Eribulin, which was only currently available in Singapore (as at April 2013).  She flew to Singapore and bought 4 doses of the drug from an oncologist there at the cost of S$8,000 per dose.  However, after three jabs, her hometown’s oncologist determined that Eribulin was not suitable for her.  He subsequently recommended Cisplatin + Gemzar and she underwent four cycles of this, the last one being around mid-August, after which she was told that further chemotherapy would not work for her.  She was totally devastated.  However, as some form of hope for her to cling on, she was given oral Xeloda.

All the while during her chemotherapy treatments in 2012, radiotherapy and further chemo in 2013, this tough lady was in pain most of the time and the pain became more and more intense in the months of April through August 2013.   From April 2013 her lungs started accumulating fluids…this is usually a confirmation of metastasis to the lungs. In the month of August till her demise on Sunday, 25th August, she had to be on oxygen most of the time (in addition to morphine).

She did try some herbal treatment off and on in between her chemotherapy/radiotherapy sessions in 2013.  Obviously this could not help her much as by that time her body was a total wreck.  Further, she only changed her diet in 2013. During 2012 she “ate anything she liked” as advised by the oncologist in Singapore and from her hometown.

When I attended her wake on 27th August 2013, the first thing that her eldest son said to me was “Uncle, see – only 19 months!”  Of course her oncologist and other doctors attributed this to her triple negative breast cancer which is supposed to be an aggressive form of breast cancer. Anyway, it is always about the cancer being aggressive, and never about the toxicities and ineffectiveness of the conventional cancer treatments which is always marketed and touted as evidence-based, scientifically tested, etc.

Lately, we noticed a new current trend in breast cancer treatment very similar to this case –more and more patients are advised to have pre-surgery chemotherapy – to shrink the lump before surgery.  We are very perplexed by this – why do you need to shrink the lump first before surgery when the breast, an “external” organ, can be wholly removed by mastectomy?  We know of a lady who recently had a 5 cm lump removed by lumpectomy and is recovering well and she has refused any form of chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

This trend of pre-surgery chemotherapy first is a huge business (if you catch my drift) for the medical/cancer establishment.  This unfortunate lady paid RM80,000 for the EC and Docetaxel in 2012.  Imagine how much the drug companies/and oncologists would make if they can persuade a million ladies to do so annually, world-wide.

It is mind-boggling, and the damage to the body, and the suffering, is also mind-boggling.

Just to conclude, this is the lady’s 19-months timeline summary:

a)    December 2011 – diagnosis

b)    December 2012 – commenced EC x 6 sessions followed by Docetaxel x 5 sessions

c)     January to March 2013 – 33 sessions of radiotherapy + oral cyclosphomide.

d)    April/May 2013 – 3 sessions of Eribulin

e)     July to August 2013 – 4 sessions of Cisplatin/Gemzar.  When Cisplatin/Gemzar was stopped after the 3rd session, she was given Xeloda

f)     25th August 2013 – passed away.

Undoubtedly, she has found peace with the Lord now but you do not have to follow her timeline. Follow Olivia Newton John’s cancer journey….she was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1992, did one year of chemotherapy and complemented her treatments with good nutrition, herbs, homeopathy, acupuncture and practiced meditation and prayer….and Olivia is still very much alive today (22 years later)…..watch out for her more detailed story soon.

HOW MISSING DATA CAN MISLEAD DOCTORS AND HARM PATIENTS

Bad Pharma

Reviewed by: Yeong Sek Yee & Khadijah Shaari

This article is a summary of Chapter 1 “MISSING DATA” of the bestselling book, BAD PHARMA by Dr Ben Goldacre which was released in Oct 2012. The author Dr Ben Michael Goldacre, graduated in 1995 with a first-class honors degree in medicine from Magdalen College, Oxford, obtained an MA in philosophy from Kings College London, and undertook clinical training at UCL Medical School, qualifying as a medical doctor in 2000 and as a psychiatrist in 2005. As of 2012 he is Wellcome research fellow in epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

“Missing Data” in the context of clinical trials/research means data that are not reported by the drug companies when the clinical trials/research are completed or not completed. Obviously these are data that are “negative” or “unflattering” for the drug being tested. And obviously, these “unfavourable” results will not be included in their submissions to the respective regulators. In other words, only favourable results are submitted or published.

Dr Goldacre strongly argued that the clinical trials undertaken by drug companies routinely reach conclusions favourable to the company. These positive results are achieved in a number of ways:

  • Sometimes the industry-sponsored trials are flawed by design (for example by comparing the new drug with something that is known to be rubbish or an existing drug at an inadequate dose or perhaps a placebo sugar pill that does almost nothing).
  • Trial patients can be chosen very carefully, to make a positive result more likely.
  • In addition, the data is studied as the trial progresses, and if the trial seems to be producing negative data it is stopped prematurely and the results are not published.
  • On the other hand, if the trial is producing positive data, it may be stopped early so that longer-term effects are not examined.
  • Drug companies are free to conduct as many trials as they wish…they can then choose which ones to publish. This is known as “publication bias.”

According to Dr Goldacre, “the problem of negative studies going missing has been known for almost as long as people have been doing serious science” This was formally documented by a psychologist Theodore Sterling in 1959. He went through every paper published in the 4 big psychology journals of the time, and found that 286 out of 294 reported a statistically significant result. This, he explained, was plainly fishy. Sterling was the first to put these ideas into a formal academic context, but the basic truth had been recognized for many centuries. Francis Bacon explained in 1620 that we often mislead ourselves by only remembering the times something worked, and forgetting those when it didn’t.

Watch Dr Goldacre on YouTube…What Doctors Don’t Know About the drugs they prescribehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKmxL8VYy0M

Why Does “Missing Data” matter?

1)      According to Dr Goldacre:

  • Evidence is the only way we can possibly know if something works or doesn’t work in medicine. In the real world of medicine, published evidence is used to make treatment decisions.
  • When doctors are misled about the effects of the medicines they use, they can end up making decisions that can cause avoidable suffering, or even death. We (doctors) might choose unnecessarily expensive treatments; having been misled into thinking they are more effective than cheaper older drugs. This wastes money, ultimately depriving patients of other treatments….
  • While doctors are kept in the dark, patients are exposed to inferior treatments, ineffective treatments, unnecessary treatments, and unnecessary expensive treatments that are no better than cheap ones…

2)      According to the British Medical Journal:

  • In Jan 2012, Britain’s top medical journal, the British Medical Journal disclosed that “missing data is a serious problem in clinical research given that it distorts the scientific record and prevents clinical decisions from being based on the best evidence available.” As part of an in-depth BMJ review on the subject, experts on bmj.com warn that patients can be harmed through missing clinical trial data, leading to unnecessary costs to health systems. Read the 2 articles below for further information.

a)      Article: Missing Data – A Serious Problem in Clinical Research   http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240032.php

b)      Article: Patients at risk after scientists withhold test results from clinical trials of new medicines  Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2082116/Patients-risk-scientists-withhold-test-results-clinical-trials-new-medicines.html#ixzz2cJb8VxLZ

  •  has published several papers on the subject, assessing the causes, the extent, and consequences of unpublished evidence. The papers confirm that “large proportions of evidence from human trials remain unreported, and that a lot of what is reported is inadequate.” 
  • In an editorial, Dr. Richard Lehman from the University of Oxford and BMJ Clinical Epidemiology Editor, Dr. Elizabeth Loder, revealed a “culture of haphazard publication and incomplete data disclosure,” calling for more vigorous regulation and full access to raw trial data to enable scientists to gain a better understanding of the benefits and harms of many kinds of treatment.

Besides the above, Dr Marcia Angell, MD very bluntly describes what “bias” is in clinical research. Chapter 6 of her best-seller (which all doctors and patients should read) THE TRUTH ABOUT THE DRUG COMPANIES asks “How Good Are New Drugs?” The main points in the chapter are:

  • Bias is now rampant in drug trials…this can be built into the study design, as is the case with placebo-controlled trials.
  • Another form of bias is to compare the new drug not just with a placebo but with an old drug given at too low a dose or the old drug can be administered incorrectly,
  • The trials can be designed to be too brief to be meaningful. That is true of many trials of drugs that need to be taken long term…sometimes treatments look pretty good for a short time but are not effective and may be harmful for long term use. (Is that why a lot of drugs are “recalled” after some time in the market?)….See the list below:

LINK: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_withdrawn_drugs

  • One of the most common ways to bias trials is to present only part of the data—the part that makes the product look good—and ignores the rest. This is the most dramatic form of bias…out-and-out suppression of negative results.

Is this how new drugs are “scientifically” tested? Dr Angell also gives us an idea how new drugs are “scientifically” approved:

  • The FDA may approve the drug on the basis of minimal evidence. For example, the agency usually requires simply that the drug work better than a placebo in 2 clinical trials, even if it doesn’t in other trials.
  • But companies publish only the positive results, not the negative ones. Often in fact, they publish positive results more than once, in slightly different forms in different journals, and
  • The FDA has no control over this selective publishing. This practice leads doctors to believe that drugs are much better than they are, and the public comes to share this belief, on the basis of media reports.

(Additionally, Dr Goldacre clearly pointed out in BAD PHARMA that…”Regulators frequently approve drugs that are vaguely effective, with serious side effects, on the off-chance that they might be useful to someone, somewhere, when other interventions aren’t an option.”)

To conclude, let us quote Dr Goldacre again…..

  • ”For many of the most important diseases that patients present with, we (the doctors) have no idea which of the widely used treatments is best, and, as a consequence, people suffer and die unnecessarily. Patients, the public, and even many doctors live blissful ignorance of this frightening reality, but in the medical literature, it has been pointed out again and again.”
  • “Missing Data ….poisons the well for everybody. If proper trials are never done, if trials with negative results are withheld, we simply cannot know the true effects of the treatments that we use”

After you have read both BAD PHARMA and THE TRUTH ABOUT THE DRUGS COMPANIES (there are many other such books), you will understand why Dr Russell Blaylock, a former professor of neurosurgery blatantly proclaimed that…..evidence-based medicine is the biggest con job in the history of the world (see page 161 in KNOCKOUT..Interviews with Doctors Who are Curing Cancer by Suzanne Somers).

SOME FURTHER REFERENCES ON “MISSING DATA”

1) Missing Data in Clinical Studies (Statistics in Practice) by Dr Geert Molenberghs and, Michael Kenward … provides a comprehensive account of the problems arising when data from clinical and related studies are incomplete,

2) Article: Addressing missing data in clinical trials.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21242367

3) Article: Missing Data May Skew Clinical Trials.  http://health.usnews.com/health-news/news/articles/2012/10/03/missing-data-may-skew-clinical-trials

3) Talk: Handling of Missing Data in Clinical Trials (26 min) http://hstalks.com/main/view_talk.php?t=550&r=15&j=754&c=252

4) Spot On London 2012: Ben Goldacre’s Keynote Speech  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUvd4zZckrs